Appellate Decision Affects Hospital’s Ability to Claim Immunity

The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (“HCQIA”), 42 U.S.C. 11101-11152 and the Colorado Professional Review Act, C.R.S. 12-36.5-101, were originally enacted to eliminate incompetent physicians by creating professional review committees that have the authority to suspend or terminate a physician’s medical staff privileges.  The HCQIA provides a rebuttable presumption of immunity to the professional review committee and medical facility.  In addition, peer review materials are privileged and cannot be obtained by the subjects of the peer review.

Eric Anthony Peper, M.D. was a cardiothoracic surgeon at St. Mary’s Hospital and Medical Center.  In September 2002, Dr. Peper notified St. Mary’s of his intended resignation from St. Mary’s in order to set up a competing practice at another hospital.  Within days of St. Mary’s discovering Dr. Peper’s intent to set up a competing practice, St. Mary’s selected 19 of Dr. Peper’s cases for review by an anonymous reviewer.  The reviewer did not find that Dr. Peper’s treatment in any of the cases fell below the standard of care.  Nevertheless, based solely on this review, St. Mary’s notified Dr. Peper that his privileges at the hospital were being revoked by the professional review committee and he would not be afforded a hearing or an appeal.  Because of the revocation of his privileges, Dr. Peper has been unable to obtain privileges at any hospital and has been prevented from practicing cardiothoracic surgery.

Under the HCQIA, a professional review committee is required to provide for a hearing if it finds that a physician has provided substandard patient care.  Dr. Peper argued that he properly rebutted the presumption of immunity because the peer review committee failed to afford him adequate notice and a hearing prior to revoking his staff privileges.  The hospital argued that Dr. Peper waived his statutory due process rights pursuant to a waiver of hearing contained in the hospital bylaws.

The Colorado Court of Appeals determined that any agreement to be bound by hospital bylaws was legally insufficient to waive statutory due process rights.  The Court of Appeals agreed with Dr. Peper and held that the hospital and its officers are not entitled to HCQIA immunity because Dr. Peper was denied statutory due process, including notice and a hearing, prior to revocation of his hospital privileges.

Anthony Leffert and Kimberly Bruetsch of Robinson Waters & O’Dorisio, P.C. prepared the briefs and argued Dr. Peper’s case before the Colorado Court of Appeals.

Contact our Denver business law firm for exceptional legal counsel

Since 1977, Robinson Waters & O’Dorisio, P.C. has committed to offering high-quality, personalized legal services for companies of all sizes.

To learn how we can benefit your company, call 303-297-2600 or  Contact Us Online

News & Alerts

14 RWO Lawyers Named 2024 Colorado Super Lawyers

RWO is honored to announce 14 of our attorneys have been named 2024 Colorado Super Lawyers and Rising Stars. Congratulations to our Super Lawyers – Jennifer C. Alldredge, Tracy Ashmore, Bryan Biesterfeld, Hal Bruno III, Douglas Ferguson, Juli Lapin, Anthony...

read more

RWO Ranked in 2024 Best Law Firms

We are honored to announce RWO has been featured in the 2024 edition of Best Law Firms® nationally in 2 practice areas and Metropolitan in 8 practice areas. The list of 2024 Best Law Firms® includes law firms recognized for professional excellence with persistently...

read more


Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.